- Google to fight homophobia with worldwide 'Legalize Love' campaign
- Barney Frank Weds Jim Ready
- Anderson Cooper: "The Fact Is, I'm Gay."
- Outback drag queens create wave of acceptance
- Episcopalians move closer to allowing transgender ministers
This evil carries people away like a rip tide carries swimmers away from the safety of the shore.
On a recent episode of The Hagmann & Hagmann Report with Steve Quayle, one of the Hagmanns explained a couple of odd trends in men's casual dress. The saggy pants hanging down off the butt comes from the prison culture, where men would use that to signal that they were available for butt sex. I wonder how many of those who follow that trend know what it means? Another fashion trend is the baggy pants. Apparently it's due to homosexuals who suffer from leakage and wear adult diapers. If I can be convinced that all the sodomite imagery that has been brought to light in this series can be explained away with reasonable evidence, then I'll entertain the "just hip-hop" or "just skater" explanations for these fashions I see everywhere. I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for that to happen, since no refutation of any of my claims has been advanced. In the words Paul Harvey was famous for saying on his radio show, “And now you know the rest of the story.”
The aggressive trending is the merging of genders toward a hermaphrodite that compares to a genuine as a counterfeit. This commentary in this post is not the treatise the subject deserves, but I'll address it as best I can in brief. The effort to merge the genders goes beyond social engineering through clothing fashion or homosexual behavior. The literal physical “transgendering” and “hermaphroditing” (if you will) is included in this action being taken as an assault against the Creator through the corruption and conversion of His creation, against His very image. Here's one witness in the news. Boys Turning into Girls Because of Man-Made Chemicals?
This present movement to merge the genders is related to the merge of the natures of the gods and men, from time past and future. This is seen in Google's promotion of Valentine's Day. See the panel with the stars, where the "alien" (star-angel-god) and astronaut partner up?
“In the Aeon of Horus the dualistic approach to religion will be transcended through the abolition of the present notion of a God external to oneself. The two will be united. “Man will no longer worship God as an external factor, as in Paganism, or as an internal state of consciousness, as in Christianity, but will realize his identity with God.” The new Aeon of Horus, based on the union of the male and female polarities, will involve the magical use of semen and ecstasy, culminating in an apotheosis of matter – “in the realization of the old Gnostic notion that matter is not dual but one with the Spirit” — symbolized by the androgynous Baphomet of the Templars and the Illuminati.”
Aleister Crowley and his Legacy - The Vigilant Citizen's Secret Arcana Site
Aleister Crowley and his Legacy - The Vigilant Citizen's Secret Arcana Site
What is the genuine being counterfeited by the ubiquitous Baphomet? Most will deny it, as I myself would have for most of my life, but the first Adam was what we refer to as an androgyne. He is being counterfeited. There is also an aspect that speaks to the last Adam, HaMashiach, and His Bride. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
Genesis 1:27English versions fail in transmitting what's evident in the Hebrew, so don't treat the text like the version I'm rendering here is expressing all there is.
From Who is Cain's Father? (Kindle Version) Appendix III: Of Every Tree of the Garden Thou Mayest Freely Eat:
15) And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it. 16) And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: 17) But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die. Genesis 3:15-17
"A question arises when verse 16 is considered in light of the procreative metaphor. Can what this verse seems to imply be simply dismissed by insisting it must only have the more literal interpretation, of eating regular food for sustenance? Certainly, it could be interpreted that way, but what might be implied with a consideration of the procreative metaphor?"
"Permission to freely eat of every tree of the garden (barring one, of course) was granted to the man. There is no justification for inferring this permission was extended to the woman, because it's in verse 18 that the Lord God declared that He would make a helpmate for him. It was not good that the man should be alone. It seems that whatever the man would have enjoyed in freely eating of every tree in the garden (barring one) would still have left him alone (Strong’s H909). The man was put to sleep and the solution to his being alone was taken out of him. She was of his flesh and bone."
"Whatever the other trees of the garden were, they were not of his flesh and blood (produced by bone marrow). Any relationship permitted with “every tree of the garden” would not have effected his state of being alone. The trees of the garden were not his helpmates. They were not of his kind of life. This leads to some very intriguing questions. Since trees appear to be seed bearing, having fruit with seed in themselves, could it be that the distinction of gender wasn't a factor in man's reproductive nature? When the woman was later taken out of him, something was removed, from his side. Did that contain some reproductive element that became distinct in the woman? Was the man created an androgyne, capable of reproducing without a counterpart? Was reproduction even part of his purpose at the time he was permitted to freely eat of every tree of the garden, barring one?"
"A question arises when verse 16 is considered in light of the procreative metaphor. Can what this verse seems to imply be simply dismissed by insisting it must only have the more literal interpretation, of eating regular food for sustenance? Certainly, it could be interpreted that way, but what might be implied with a consideration of the procreative metaphor?"
"Permission to freely eat of every tree of the garden (barring one, of course) was granted to the man. There is no justification for inferring this permission was extended to the woman, because it's in verse 18 that the Lord God declared that He would make a helpmate for him. It was not good that the man should be alone. It seems that whatever the man would have enjoyed in freely eating of every tree in the garden (barring one) would still have left him alone (Strong’s H909). The man was put to sleep and the solution to his being alone was taken out of him. She was of his flesh and bone."
"Whatever the other trees of the garden were, they were not of his flesh and blood (produced by bone marrow). Any relationship permitted with “every tree of the garden” would not have effected his state of being alone. The trees of the garden were not his helpmates. They were not of his kind of life. This leads to some very intriguing questions. Since trees appear to be seed bearing, having fruit with seed in themselves, could it be that the distinction of gender wasn't a factor in man's reproductive nature? When the woman was later taken out of him, something was removed, from his side. Did that contain some reproductive element that became distinct in the woman? Was the man created an androgyne, capable of reproducing without a counterpart? Was reproduction even part of his purpose at the time he was permitted to freely eat of every tree of the garden, barring one?"
18 Then the Lord God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone; I will make him a helper suitable for him.” 19 Out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the sky, and brought them to the man to see what he would call them; and whatever the man called a living creature, that was its name. 20 The man gave names to all the cattle, and to the birds of the sky, and to every beast of the field, but for Adam there was not found a helper suitable for him. 21 So the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and he slept; then He took one of his ribs and closed up the flesh at that place. 22 The Lord God fashioned into a woman the rib which He had taken from the man, and brought her to the man.
Genesis 2:18-22Male and female were in one and the same body until the woman was taken out of the man, separating the female into a body of her own that was physically independent from the male. The Lord God had said about the first formed version that it is not good for man to be alone. He knew that already before He made Adam, and it was no mistake, but this revelation speaks rather to a greater wisdom and plan. The response in acknowledgment of what was expressly not good was to separate out the female from the male, leaving the former Adam different, fully male. He did not create the woman but merely fashioned her from what was removed from man. The male+female kind in one body became two distinct genders, the female being woman, and the male, man. The Serpent seeks to merge together again what the Lord God separated into two, to revert mankind back to the state that was identified as “not good.”
Please don't write me with objections because I won't entertain them. If you know by revelation insight that what I wrote about the sinful activity in the Garden of Eden is true, you should know that the nature of Adam and the contrasting Baphomet version of the Serpent are esoteric matters, like unto the nature of the sin in the Garden. Satan is a masquerader and counterfeiter. He is not stupid, making 3 dollar bills. Clearly the androgyne Baphomet is a big deal. Is there no genuine? As all this smoke being blown without a fire to conceal?
There is a legitimate merging that is done through a right relationship.
23 The man said, “ This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh; She shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.” 24 For this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother, and be joined to his wife; and they shall become one flesh.
Genesis 2:23-24Verse 24 is quoted in Ephesians and followed by this verse.
This mystery is great; but I am speaking with reference to Christ and the church.
Ephesians 5:32What was established with the first Adam and his woman has a greater manifestation with the last Adam. This one flesh is not a feeling of oneness, and neither does it appear to simply be the genetic merging of offspring. Whatever the ultimate entity is be will be an appropriate image of the Lord God, expressed in His Creation. I believe it is distinctly male dominant in character and it is a relationship, and that will be expressed as one flesh, whether in both body and kind I cannot say I yet know. I can say I know with confidence that the androgynous Baphomet is a perversion, an antithesis. The Serpent's version is female dominant, an expression of rebellion against the Creator through a gender inversion. This is not to say that man is good and woman is bad but to acknowledge the proper order of creation. Suggested options, like the inverse or something equal are really no options at all, but the promotion of a lie.
O My people! Their oppressors are children, and women rule over them. O My people! Those who guide you lead you astray and confuse the direction of your paths.
Isaiah 3:12 So, I must insist that the making of man as an androgeny was no mistake. There was a reason for making man so, and for separating man into two distinct genders. What we're seeing with the gender merging today is not the human experiment gone out of control. The sovereign God is very much in control, and His ways are greater than our ways. What is being accomplished by the way things have gone, are going and will go will be more than adequate vindication against any accusation that demeans His love.
Google's version they want to legalize with the “Legalize Love” campaign is no love at all. It's merely a lying rebellion against the One who is Love. If you want to know something about love, read 1 John 4 sometime.
15 Whoever confesses that Jesus is the Son of God, God abides in him, and he in God. 16 We have come to know and have believed the love which God has for us. God is love, and the one who abides in love abides in God, and God abides in him.
1 John 4:15-16
No comments:
Post a Comment