Part 1 - Decoding The Penitent Man (2010)

Series Links: Decoding “The Penitent Man”

Unless you remember my mention of this film, odds are, you've never heard of it. It's not the kind of film that attracts the masses but it is notable for the insight that can be gleaned. The way I see it, if you've been learning The Plot, what the opening revelation of Jesus Christ from biblical prophecy says is now unfolding, you'll read much of it in this esoteric film's dialog. It's produced with the typical spin and smoke and mirrors of obfuscating forms, but it represents a good opportunity for teaching the truth through it.

Some of the beans spilled in this illumined production are evident without any identification of the characters in their multiple roles. More are spilled when you understanding who they represent.

Here's the description from IMDb. It was written by Mirror Images LTD, the entity representing the film's writer and director.

“The Penitent Man tells the story of psychologist Dr. Jason Pyatt, a man devoted to his work - a man torn from his family. With his struggling marriage and mounting bills, Jason is at a crossroads with the life he has chosen and the life he could have. When one of his clients - the mysterious Mr. Darnell - walks into his office and paints him a repentant tale of future economic and moral collapse, Jason's eyes are forever opened. With the help of his best friend Ovid, he embarks on a personal mission to change the course of his future, and possibly the world, forever.”

There's not much action but plenty of dialog. Most of the exchange is between Dr. Pyatt and Mr. Darnell in Pyatt's office. Those scenes are woven in with conversations Pyatt has with his friend Ovid, mostly over lunch. This isn't a review, so, as usual, there's spoilers.

The man responsible for the low budget film is Nicholas Gyeney. His last name is pronounced “genie.” If your wish is to be enchanted with mind-control imagery, he seems to have granted it. If you're accustomed to finding visual symbolism in movies you don't have to look hard to find evidence of the spiritual subtext. Dr. Pyatt's office is decorated with idols, with statues and masks on shelves and on the walls. In some of the scenes of Pyatt and Ovid meeting for lunch we see a totem pole. The name, Ovid, makes a fairly obvious link with the famous Roman poet, the author of Metamorphosis.

I'm going to share a few insights that I think are most relevant because of the deception that is coming as the Antichrist is about to be revealed, and then is. Here's my plot summary.

Mr. Darnell comes to Dr. Pyatt as a patient, but not one who seeks the kind of help a typical patient might. The quite rational and intelligent Darnell claims to be from the future. He weaves an engaging tale of having discovered the secret to time travel, receiving it in a sudden insight. He shared it with the government and they paid him well for it. What he shared gave people the ability to view history, not the future. He withheld his knowledge of how to travel. The ability to view events all the way back to the beginning eventually went public and society basically crashed and burned because people lost hope for the future. The reality he described wasn't the truth, the revelation of the Bible, but rather the standard version (fabricated lies) that's taught in “public” school. Darnell gives the impression that by engaging Pyatt in this tale he's hoping to get some redemption, because he's a penitent man, by saving the world from the ruin he ignorantly brought upon it. He believes Pyatt is somehow going to be able to benefit from the wisdom he conveys and thereby change the course of history. By the end of the film, we come to understand that Pyatt and Darnell are the same man. Darnell went back in time in a gambit to "change fate" by warning his younger self of the outcome if he chooses to go down the same road. We see in the closing scenes the implication that, although the way it happens is different, the outcome will be the same. Pyatt-Darnell therefore fails in his attempt to change his destiny and the fate of the world.

There are many theories about time-space manipulation, viewing and travel. I'm not interested in theory, and not smart enough to figure things out on my own. I believe the Lord is able to inform us about what we need to know.

Here's some of the visual imagery that speaks volumes about the esoteric nature of the content.

A notable scene takes place late in the film that is kind of a money shot, loaded up with symbolism. This image is the focal part of that. Pyatt is walking down the street carrying a bouquet of roses. The roses are lined up with a 5 point star. Stacked primary symbols of Venus don't just happen accidentally. That symbolism is not only well supported in the visual imagery, it factors in to the esoteric layer of the developing plot.

Pyatt buys the bouquet from a florist who wears a t-shirt bearing the classic winged emblem of angels and gods. It reads, The Falling.



The obvious reference is to the falling of angels, the subject of Genesis 6 and Enoch 8-9.

His apron makes allusion to the Masonic apron, and represents what that represents, a covering like Adam and Eve received prior to their eviction from the Garden of Eden.

A little research turns up the fact that the t-shirt names the title of Gyeney's first film, which he made while he was still a student in film school. The following excerpts from an interview are worth noting. (Nicholas Gyeney On 'The Penitent Man')

“At the age of 20, Nicholas completed his first independent film, The Falling. The film premiered in Seattle in 2006 to a crowd of 600 people. The film resulted in a standing ovation that lasted through the scrolling end credits.
...
We shot the movie in 12 days in and around Seattle in the Capital Hill area in a big Masonic home/ retirement hospital. It’s a Masonic building called “The Landmark on the Sound”, which is a very cool place.”

A Masonic building. Sometimes that might not mean much, and sometimes it does. The film's symbolism suggests that all the locations were chosen with intent to leverage those symbols in the way of Occult ritual.

Here's the logo for Mirror Images, LTD. Again, that entity is basically, Nicholas Gyeney, the writer and director of the film. Drawing upon over 4 years of decoding as documented on this blog, it decodes to 666. Leveraging the letter i as a 9, the 999 formed inverts to 666. The reflection signals the Hermetic Maxim, As Above, So Below. It's a spiral “i” of Horus. Mirror Images, makes reference to the “twinning” of trauma-based Illuminati mind-control programming because alter identities are created in mirror image pairs. The spiral “i” of Horus makes reference to the anal vortex or kundalini energy involved in the ritual sodomy that brings the slave to dissociation and illumination. The mirror is a classic goddess symbol, and so is the spiral. I see the logo as a triple goddess image (maiden-mother-crone), and as a genetic model of the triple helix DNA of that coming trans-human beast life. That life is usually identified as Horus produced as Isis raises Osiris. There are 2 yonic vesica piscis shapes, each inside a classic Ichthus, the messianic fish that represents the magickal phallus of Osiris, eaten by the fish. It's a bit like the astrological glyph for Virgo and even more like the one for Scorpio. With Virgo as the virgin goddess and Scorpio as a Golden Gate sign, it speaks to me of Theurgy. The M and I letters represented by the logo decode to 13 and 9, important signal numbers I've written about at length over the years. The 13 represents the rebel-lord-beast and the goddess and their union. The 9 is the single digit signaling the (three times three) transformation of the mark of the beast.

All that? Really? Yeah - and probably more. It's high level stuff.

Here's a sample of the conversation Darnell has with Pyatt in his office.

Dr. Pyatt: Yeah, I do have a question. So how does this thing work? Anybody can just travel back?

Darnell: No. That is not what I intended. You can't just give anyone the power to actually go back. Think of the ramifications of that. What I envisioned was more like a window in time.

Dr. Pyatt: A window? Like what? Like a big screen what you could just see history on?

Darnell: Yes, a bit simplified, but yes. Once it was released publicly, people could see any time they desired without directly affecting past events. It was the only way to keep it safe. So we thought.

Dr. Pyatt: So theoretically anybody could see anything.

Darnell: Think about it as memory recall. Everyone has experiences they can revisit even vividly. Now imagine events in time as memories for the world in the space-time continuum. I discovered a way to harness that.

Dr. Pyatt: Now you mentioned being able to see the creation of man. I mean, you could see humans assemble, develop their gods, and destroy each other. I mean, Jesus Christ!

Darnell: He was just a man. Imagine the devastation from a revelation like that. 95% of the world's population believed in a god in some form. The scientists, the politicians, and eventually the public were able to go back and see the Christian Son of God as a mortal man. It shook the foundations. Even atheists began to lose hope for the future. Southern evangelists began lashing out violently at anybody who supported the new discovery. The world was more divided than ever. The road to hell had been paved with good intentions, and it was just the beginning.

Dr. Pyatt: Well what happened, some kind of big war, or?

Darnell: Once the technology was simplified ... Only the most wealthy could afford it at first but with any new technology price decreases with time. People were going back to the beginning. They were peering into new dimensions of space and time looking for positive proof of evolution, the origins of man, the mythic stories from ancient Greece, and it spread like wildfire and informed civilization as we know it.

Dr. Pyatt: If this technology existed we could learn everything.

Darnell: Everything.

Dr. Pyatt: I mean, think of what we could do. What we could accomplish with that.

Hey, just think of what we could accomplish with that. Right. There's the familiar line of thinking that inspires many fools in their folly. Darnell acknowledges having thought that (when he was Pyatt, of course), but makes a point about the potential was exploited in actual practice to bring bad results instead of good.

I've been writing about the nature of the deception that will open the way for the Antichrist's reception. I put many examples on exhibit that illustrate how a window into the past will be opened as into the Akashic Record. A twisted version of history's most significant people and events will be actively projected, globally, and false memories will be activated in a shared experience that is both collective and individual in how it is interpreted. Religious figureheads must be targeted as the focus of attention, being the basis for social order with constraints imposed by the implicit morality structures of large segments of the population. Romans 11 reveals how the key to history and man lies with the identity named, and profaned, in the script of The Penitent Man.

Is the presentation of Jesus Christ as being just a mortal man going to be enough to shake the foundations of those who profess to be Christians? Sure, but you should know that the epic scam is going to go beyond that. Here's the biblical description that reveals how it's going to go.

1 Now we request you, brethren, with regard to the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our gathering together to Him, 2 that you not be quickly shaken from your composure or be disturbed either by a spirit or a message or a letter as if from us, to the effect that the day of the Lord has come. 3 Let no one in any way deceive you, for it will not come unless the apostasy comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, 4 who opposes and exalts himself above every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, displaying himself as being God. ~ 2 Thessalonians 2:1-4

What is revealed to us about that most threatening hour is not just about the saints being quickly shaken from our composure. There is a component that involves convincing evidence about the promised resurrection. Our hope rests firmly upon that, and, if that resurrection is already past, we will be left without hope.

It is my custom to repeat an important caveat, that it's not enough for you to believe what I'm telling you now about this event, to be spared from being deceived in that hour of crisis. Knowledge of the time and the trust relationship that represents is going to be essential.

I will repeat another precautionary warning, which you are probably choosing to ignore. If you are one who thinks you can continue taking matters of gender propriety lightly and still be found as one who “wins the race,” it's a bad bet. The problem Israel had in their wilderness trial was that they did not forsake their idols. That was an example for our benefit, ladies and gentlemen of the Body of Christ.

You adulteresses, do you not know that friendship with the world is hostility toward God? Therefore whoever wishes to be a friend of the world makes himself an enemy of God ~ James 4:4

Moving on, Darnell describes a world where the gods are stripped of their deity, but that's not how it's going to be. A man will be deified and accepted as the incarnation of each man's god. The goddess will manifest in glory and affirm the deification as baptismal rites are performed by her high priest, the Pope. Key elements lacking in this film's script are furnished by the visual imagery and supported by the esoteric identities of the characters.

Let's explore one of Pyatt's clever lines a little more deeply.

“Now you mentioned being able to see the creation of man. I mean, you could see humans assemble, develop their gods, and destroy each other. I mean, Jesus Christ!”

When Pyatt says, “I mean, Jesus Christ!” we interpret it as an emotional outburst. We hear him uttering a common profanity, “taking the Lord's name in vain.” We dismiss the words, “I mean,” as filler words, a meaningless expression. Having just heard the same filler words in the previous expression, it's an obvious conclusion. Yet, when we make the effort to analyze it in context we discover a deeper meaning. Darnell seized the opportunity to declare from his enlightened perspective that “the Christian Son of God” was just a mortal man, making Him a liar and the Bible a falsified account, fraudulent. Pyatt's well crafted line is a similar assault, on the integrity of the apostles and eye witnesses to His resurrection. It's a subtle device. When he says, “I mean, Jesus Christ,” consider this as a tip-off. He's explaining the subject of his previous statement. About what he just said, he means, Jesus Christ. He is the subject, the singular “god” that he suggests men assembled and developed. “I mean, you could see humans assemble, develop their gods, and destroy each other. I mean, Jesus Christ!” He's referencing and supporting an age old conspiracy.

Matthew's gospel provides an account of what happened following the crucifixion.

27:59 And Joseph took the body and wrapped it in a clean linen cloth, 60 and laid it in his own new tomb, which he had hewn out in the rock; and he rolled a large stone against the entrance of the tomb and went away. 61 And Mary Magdalene was there, and the other Mary, sitting opposite the grave. 62 Now on the next day, the day after the preparation, the chief priests and the Pharisees gathered together with Pilate, 63 and said, “Sir, we remember that when He was still alive that deceiver said, ‘After three days I am to rise again.’ 64 Therefore, give orders for the grave to be made secure until the third day, otherwise His disciples may come and steal Him away and say to the people, ‘He has risen from the dead,’ and the last deception will be worse than the first.” 65 Pilate said to them, “You have a guard; go, make it as secure as you know how.” 66 And they went and made the grave secure, and along with the guard they set a seal on the stone. 28:1 Now after the Sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary came to look at the grave. 2 And behold, a severe earthquake had occurred, for an angel of the Lord descended from heaven and came and rolled away the stone and sat upon it. 3 And his appearance was like lightning, and his clothing as white as snow. 4 The guards shook for fear of him and became like dead men. 5 The angel said to the women, “Do not be afraid; for I know that you are looking for Jesus who has been crucified. 6 He is not here, for He has risen, just as He said. Come, see the place where He was lying. 7 Go quickly and tell His disciples that He has risen from the dead; and behold, He is going ahead of you into Galilee, there you will see Him; behold, I have told you.” 11 Now while they were on their way, some of the guard came into the city and reported to the chief priests all that had happened. 12 And when they had assembled with the elders and consulted together, they gave a large sum of money to the soldiers, 13 and said, “You are to say, ‘His disciples came by night and stole Him away while we were asleep.’ 14 And if this should come to the governor’s ears, we will win him over and keep you out of trouble.” 15 And they took the money and did as they had been instructed; and this story was widely spread among the Jews, and is to this day. ~ Matthew 27:59 - 28:15

I don't doubt that the conspiracy being given a further bump by Gyeney's clever script will be validated in the coming hour of crisis with false evidence, ported through time itself as a epic hoax. The evidence offered in support of the lie will be quite real. It just won't be true.